ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology
Exploring the Landscape: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Ophthalmology and Optometry Research Fields in Africa.
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the trends, patterns, and dynamics of ophthalmology and optometry research in Africa, focusing on publication trends, authorship patterns, collaborative networks, and citation analysis. Methods: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Scopus database to identify publications in ophthalmology and optometry from inception to 2023. Data on publication trends, most active source titles, research themes, geographic distribution, collaborative networks, funding sponsors, authorship patterns, and citation analysis were extracted and analyzed. Results: The results revealed a steady increase in publications in ophthalmology and optometry research in Africa, with a notable acceleration observed from 2011 onwards. The British Journal of Ophthalmology emerged as the most active journal source, highlighting the dominance of international journals in African ophthalmic research. South Africa emerged as the leading contributor to research efforts, with significant contributions from international collaborations. Naidoo was found to be the most influential on the continent. However, a disparity in authorship representation was noted, with most influential non-African authors. Citation analysis highlighted the prominence of papers addressing global issues, raising questions about equitable attribution of citations to African researchers. Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into the landscape of ophthalmology and optometry research in Africa, highlighting both progress and challenges. While the increasing publication output reflects growing interest and recognition in the field, efforts are needed to address disparities in authorship representation and research funding. By fostering collaboration, promoting local capacity-building, and ensuring equitable recognition of African researchers, we can work towards a more inclusive and impactful research ecosystem that advances eye health outcomes for the continent's diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.