ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Development and validation of patient safety educational booklet to empower anesthesia process owners to improve safety compliance before, during and after anesthesia.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of patient safety culture education program among healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraining healthcare process owners in patient safety has led to a reduction in medical errors. Face-to-face learning can be time-consuming and limited. Written health education can complement verbal education and increase knowledge, self-management, and commitment to treatment.
aimsThis study aimed to develop an educational booklet following a systematic process to design, validate, and implement the educational booklet. METHODS AND MATERIAL: This study employed a methodological approach divided into three stages: 1. Selection of content 2. Design 3. Validation of appearance and content. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used to analyze expert judges' data on the educational booklet's content validity. Content Validity Index (CVI) is calculated at item (I-CVI) and scale (S-CVI/Ave) levels. Minimum acceptable values set: I-CVI 0.78, S-CVI/Ave 0.90. The binomial test in SPSS Version 26 assessed I-CVI reliability with an expected agreement proportion of 0.8. Significance level for all tests was 0.05.
resultsAfter submitting the printed draft of the first version of the educational booklet to the evaluators, the minimum values of I-CVI and S-CVI for the designed scale items, in terms of appearance and content validity, were 0.82 and 0.98, respectively. The minimum observed agreement ratio for the items in this evaluation was 0.85, exceeding the expected agreement ratio (test ratio) of 0.80.
conclusionBased on the findings, the mentioned educational booklet has acceptable appearance and content validity. It can be used to increase the awareness of anesthesia professionals to enhance performance in the field of patient safety. A similar approach could be adopted for the development of other health information booklets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.