ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Training undergraduate students to incorporate new periodontal disease classification system.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA significant update to the classification of periodontal and peri-implant disorders was made during the 2017 World Workshop organized by the European Federation of Periodontology (EFP) and the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant disorders and conditions. The goal of this study was to see how effectively a concentrated training program that helped undergraduate dentistry students integrate the new method of classification for periodontal disease into their clinical practice performed. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn observational study was conducted with 139 dental students. They were trained on the 2017 periodontal disease classification system through lectures, clinical exercises, and case discussions. Assessments were performed before and after the training to measure students' familiarity, comfort, and clinical performance in identifying periodontal disorders.
resultsFollowing the training, there was a substantial improvement in students' understanding of the new classification system, with an average increase of 30% in accurate replies on written exams (
conclusionThis study demonstrates that undergraduate dental students' theoretical comprehension and clinical practice may be considerably improved by coordinated, multimodal training that assists them in integrating the 2017 periodontal disease classification system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.