ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2025
Traumatic knee injury healthcare pathways and outcomes: the Australian Knee Injury Inception Cohort Study (KIICS) protocol.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors Influencing Consultant Knee Surgeons' Decision Making in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury Management in Athletes: An International Delphi Study.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decision-making for the optimal management of traumatic knee injuries can be challenging. Clinical trials reveal only small differences between surgical and non-surgical approaches, while patient and clinician biases, as well as healthcare access issues, may also influence management. Little is known about the real-world healthcare pathways for patients with a knee injury, as well as the person- and/or healthcare-related factors that influence management strategies and outcomes. The Australian Knee Injury Inception Cohort Study (KIICS) aims to: (1) describe healthcare pathways following acute knee injury (including the timing and type of healthcare consultations); (2) identify patient- and/or healthcare-related predictors of management strategy (ie, surgical vs non-surgical); and (3) examine the long-term outcome of different injury types, healthcare pathways and management strategies. KIICS is a nationwide prospective longitudinal inception cohort study recruiting Australians who have sustained an acute knee injury within the previous 6 months that disrupted daily activities or sports and led to a healthcare consultation. Participants will complete online questionnaires at enrolment and at 6 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years post-injury. The data to be collected will include sociodemographic characteristics, knee injury history, the sequence of healthcare consultations and referral patterns, and management strategies (ie, surgical vs non-surgical). Patient-reported outcomes will include knee pain and instability, knee-related quality of life, patient-acceptable symptom state, health-related quality of life, mental health, fear of reinjury, return-to-sport status and activity level. Detailed statistical analysis plans will be developed to address the study's key research questions, informing clinical practice, shared decision-making and healthcare policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.