ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Leveraging productivity indicators for anomaly detection in swine breeding herds with unsupervised learning.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From machine learning to digital twin integration for livestock production and research.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In swine disease surveillance, obtaining labeled data for supervised learning models can be challenging because many farms lack standardized diagnostic routines and consistent health monitoring systems. Unsupervised learning is particularly suitable in such scenarios because it does not require labeled data, allowing for detecting anomalies without predefined labels. This study evaluates the effectiveness of unsupervised machine learning models in detecting anomalies in productivity indicators in swine breeding herds. Methods: Anomalies, defined as deviations from expected patterns, were identified in indicators such as abortions per 1000 sows, prenatal losses, preweaning mortality, total born, liveborn, culled sows per 1000 sows, and dead sows per 1000 sows. Three unsupervised models - Isolation Forest, Autoencoder, and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) - were applied to data from two swine production systems. The herd-week was used as the unit of analysis, and anomaly scores above the 75th percentile were used to flag anomalous weeks. A permutation test assessed differences between anomalous and non-anomalous weeks. Performance was evaluated using F1-score, precision, and recall, with true anomalous weeks defined as those coinciding with reported health challenges, including porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) and Seneca Valley virus outbreaks. A total of 8,044 weeks were analyzed. Results: The models identified 336 anomalous weeks and 1,008 non-anomalous weeks in Production System 1, and 1,675 anomalous weeks and 5,025 non-anomalous weeks in Production System 2. The results from the permutation test revealed significant differences in productivity indicators between anomalous and non-anomalous weeks, especially during PRRS outbreaks, with more subtle changes observed during Seneca Valley virus outbreaks. The models performed well in detecting the PRRSV anomaly, achieving perfect precision (100%) across all models for both production systems. For anomalies like SVV the models showed lower performance compared to PRRSV. Discussion: These findings suggest that unsupervised machine learning models are promising tools for early disease detection in swine herds, as they can identify anomalies in productivity data that may signal health challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.