Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41334220›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Post feline infectious peritonitis progressive hydrocephalus: a case series.

Mallory Clouse, W Ryan Detwiler, Erika A Gibson, Jessica Eich, Jason Berg, Richard Joseph

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mallory ClouseDepartment of Neurology, MedVet Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, United States.
W Ryan DetwilerDepartment of Radiology, BluePearl Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Erika A GibsonDepartment of Neurology, Guardian Veterinary Specialists, Brewster, NY, United States.
Jessica EichDepartment of Neurology, Guardian Veterinary Specialists, Brewster, NY, United States.
Jason BergDepartment of Neurology, Guardian Veterinary Specialists, Brewster, NY, United States.
Richard JosephDepartment of Neurology, Guardian Veterinary Specialists, Brewster, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While in recent years, great strides have been made in treating cats with feline infectious peritonitis (FIP), long-term sequelae of the disease are unknown. Objectives: We aimed to describe the MRI findings of cats who were presented for follow-up care post-treatment with GS-441524. Animals: Four cats who underwent treatment for FIP diagnosed based on MRI and were re-presented 13-15 months post-treatment were evaluated. Three cats were re-presented with vestibular signs. Methods: Cases were selected based on clinical signs and history of treatment of neurologic FIP. All cats were examined by a veterinary neurologist or neurology resident at each appointment. All MRIs were reviewed by a board-certified veterinary radiologist. Necropsy of Cat 2 was performed by a board-certified veterinary pathologist. Details of diagnostic test results and treatment were retrospectively acquired by review of medical records. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis was performed and interpreted by a board-certified veterinary pathologist at an outside reference laboratory. FCoV PCR testing was submitted to university reference and commercial reference laboratories. Results: All cats presented had been treated with owner-sourced GS-441524 (off-label) for the standard 84 days. All cats improved clinically after treatment, evidenced by neurologic exam findings and owner reports. Three affected cats were re-presented for neurologic decline >1 year post-treatment; one cat remained neurologically stable. After MRI confirmed progressive hydrocephalus in the three affected cats, all were treated with ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement, with noted improvement in neurologic status post-operatively. The fourth cat showed improvement of hydrocephalus on MRI based on ventricular size. CSF analysis was performed for all cats, showing no evidence of active inflammation. CSF of three cats were negative for FCoV PCR (one cat had insufficient quantity collected for testing). One affected cat was euthanized for recurrent urinary obstruction; necropsy showed moderate to severe hydrocephalus with mild parenchymal collapse, and no evidence of active infection or inflammation was noted. Conclusion and clinical importance: Progressive post-FIP hydrocephalus should be a differential for cats re-presenting with neurologic signs after treatment for FIP with GS-441524. As the treatment is now legally available in the United States, more cases are likely to occur. It is important to differentiate these progressive post FIP hydrocephalus cases from relapses of FIP, as prognosis and treatment differ.

Indexed as

feline coronavirus (FCoV)feline infectious peritonitis (FIP)hydrocephalusMRIventriculoperitoneal (VP) shuntvestibular function

Identifiers

PMID41334220
PMCPMC12668203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.