ArticleJugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong2025
[Training Outcomes of Healthcare Workers for Emerging and Bioterrorism-related Infectious Disease Response, 2024].
Article in Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Results of the 2025 Training Program for Healthcare Workers in Emerging and Bioterrorism-related Infectious Disease Response.Public health weekly report · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The 2024 training program for healthcare workers responding to emerging and bioterrorism-related infectious diseases was conducted to train specialized personnel capable of responding promptly and effectively to infectious disease outbreaks. This study aimed to analyze the program's implementation, evaluate its effectiveness, and propose directions for future improvement. Methods: The training program consisted of three basic courses and four advanced courses and was conducted a total of 13 times. Advanced courses aimed to enhance practical competencies through tabletop and functional exercises. Training effectiveness was assessed using Kirkpatrick's Level 1 (training satisfaction) and Level 2 (learning assessment) models to measure learning efficacy, practical efficacy, and knowledge improvement. Results: A total of 231 participants completed the program, achieving 103.1% of the planned enrolment of 224 participants. Functional exercises received the highest satisfaction scores. Assessment of effectiveness revealed an increase of 48.7% in learning efficacy, 102.2% in practical efficacy, and 10.2% in knowledge levels. Conclusions: The training program effectively strengthened practical competencies, with the most significant impact on improving practical efficacy. Expanding functional exercises and enhancing the educational infrastructure will be essential for future program improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.