ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Differential regulation of soil microecology in crop rotation systems of maize, seed pumpkin, and processing tomato.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Rhizosphere to Resistance: Microbe-Plant Interactions in Eco-Smart Biocontrol.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Review
- Crop rotation-driven changes in secondary metabolites of potato rhizosphere soil exert stronger regulation on soil microbial community.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-term continuous cropping of processing tomatoes in Xinjiang has led to soil degradation and microecological imbalance, severely constraining the sustainable development of the industry. To investigate the mitigation mechanisms of different crop rotation systems, this study established maize-tomato rotation (SZa), pumpkin (for seeds)-tomato rotation (SLa), and continuous cropping control (SSa) treatments in a long-term continuously cropped tomato field. The results demonstrated that compared to SSa, the SLa treatment increased the proportion of large aggregates (>2 mm) by 16.5%, whereas the SZa treatment decreased it by 24.6%. Rotation significantly reduced soil pH (by 5.6%-6.0%) and increased electrical conductivity (by 124%-215%). Enzyme activities responded variably: phosphatase activity increased by 13.9%, while urease and sucrase activities significantly decreased. Microbial α-diversity was significantly enhanced, with the Shannon index for bacteria and fungi increasing by up to 10.3% and 24.3%, respectively. Network analysis revealed that SZa optimized bacterial network complexity, while SLa specifically reduced the abundance of Ascomycota (by 17.5%) and reshaped the fungal community. Notably, the SLa treatment significantly decreased soil total potassium content by 13.6%. This study confirms that both maize and pumpkin rotation can regulate the soil microecology through differentiated strategies, providing an important theoretical basis for optimizing cropping systems of processing tomatoes in Xinjiang.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.