ArticleResuscitation plus2025
Early EEG and serum biomarkers for prognostication after cardiac arrest.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic Value of Serum S100B Protein for Neurological Outcomes After Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale: Early electroencephalography (EEG), initiated within 12 h after cardiac arrest, allows reliable prognostication in approximately 50 % of comatose patients. Serum biomarkers may complement early EEG-based outcome prediction, particularly in indeterminate cases. We evaluated the potential additive prognostic value of the serum biomarkers neuron-specific enolase (NSE), neurofilament light chain (NfL), S100 calcium binding protein Methods: In this pilot study, we analysed serum biomarker concentrations at multiple time points (<12 h, 24 h, 72 h, 7 days) post-CA in comatose out-of-hospital CA patients included in the ghrelin in coma (GRECO) trial. EEG recordings were visually evaluated at 12 and 24 h post-arrest. Neurological outcomes were assessed using the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score at 6 months, dichotomised into good (CPC 1-2) or poor (CPC 3-5). Results: A total of 49 patients were included; 24 (49 %) had a poor neurological outcome at 6 months. Serum biomarker concentrations were significantly higher in poor-outcome patients within 24 h post-CA. NfL achieved an AUC of 0.90, followed by p-Tau181 (AUC 0.81), S100B (AUC 0.80) and NSE (AUC 0.76) for poor neurological outcome at 24 h post-CA. In 40 patients with EEG, NfL > 100 pg/mL reclassified indeterminate cases as likely poor outcome, with >128 pg/mL at any time achieving 100 % specificity, unlike other biomarkers. Significance: NfL demonstrated superior prognostic performance compared to other serum biomarkers. Our preliminary findings suggest added prognostic value of NfL when combined with early EEG (12-24 h), particularly in patients with indeterminate EEG findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.