ArticleJugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong2024
[Establishing a Comprehensive Monitoring System for Natural Disasters: The Associations between Wildfire Exposure and Health Outcomes].
Article in Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the health impacts of a 2017 wildfire on residents in both exposed and non-exposed areas, highlighting the increasing importance of health consequences related to natural disasters in contemporary society. The research utilizes retrospective data to compare health outcomes before and after the wildfire, between the two groups. Health impacts are assessed through rates of outpatient visits and hospitalizations, with a focus on conditions such as congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and pneumonia in the exposed area. The study conducted rapid analysis using advanced techniques, including the double-difference method and time series analysis, to identify significant changes and outcomes. Expert consultations and the Delphi method enhanced the accuracy of the analysis, aiding in the identification of vulnerable areas and health conditions. The research emphasizes the importance of collaboration with various agencies to secure data during the pre-preparedness phase and recommends proactive on-site investigations and tracking and observation protocols during retrospective analysis. In the response phase, the focus was on rapid data collection, advanced analysis identification of high-risk populations in exposed areas, and precise tracking and response strategies. Furthermore, the study suggests the potential for proposing legislative measures to support residents in exposed areas. The establishment of a comprehensive and systematic monitoring system based on the findings of this research, is expected to contribute to a deeper understanding of natural disaster exposure and its associated health impacts, as well as to the development of effective response strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.