ArticleJugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong2025
[Recommendations of the Korea Expert Committee on Immunization Practices for Pneumococcal Vaccination in Children].
Article in Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) identified an increasing prevalence of pneumococcal serotypes not covered by vaccines that are currently used for pediatric invasive pneumococcal disease. In response, the KDCA decided to introduce a 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20), which offers broader serotype coverage. Methods: The Pneumococcal/Meningococcal Subcommittee and the Korea Expert Committee on Immunization Practices (KECIP) reviewed the appropriateness of introducing PCV20, focusing on disease characteristics, vaccine properties, cost-effectiveness, and vaccine acceptability. Detailed implementation guidelines were also discussed. Results: PCV20 provided broader serotype coverage than existing vaccines and demonstrated non-inferior immunogenicity for shared serotypes and superior immunogenicity for additional serotypes. Safety has been confirmed through regulatory approval and existing data. As no additional costs were anticipated, the vaccine was considered cost effective. Based on domestic and international experiences, high vaccine acceptability is expected. In healthy children and adolescents, the principle is to complete the vaccination series using the same vaccine administered at initiation. However, for patients who started with PCV13, switching to PCV15 or PCV20 is permitted. PCV20 will also be used as a booster vaccination in high-risk children, with vaccine support for high-risk groups expanding to 18 years of age. Conclusions: The KECIP made a timely decision to introduce PCV20 into the National Immunization Program for children and recommends its safe implementation in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.