ArticleTrauma case reports2025
Anatomical background of the "Cunéo and Picot" fracture with posterior dislocation and report of a case. Could it be treated conservatively?
Article in Trauma case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The "Cuneo and Picot" is a particular lesion of the malleoli. If misdiagnosed, it could be a serious factor of instability, having an impact on the posterior continence of the mortice. Case description: The present work reports the successful management of a "Cuneo-Picot" isolated fracture with posterior sub-luxation. The patient was treated conservatively with closed reduction under general anesthesia, and a circumferential cast immobilization for six weeks, followed by a functional rehabilitation protocol. The "Cuneo and Picot" osteochondral fragment potentially exhibits instability, even if the posterior fragment malleolar fragment is small, making them difficult to recognize through conventional X-rays, demanding Computer Tomography (CT) scan. In this case, the post-reduction CT scan showed stable syndesmosis and at the final follow-up X-ray showed adequate bone healing. The patient was able to return to physical activities and presented satisfactory functional outcomes. Conclusion: This report highlights the identification of this distinct fracture-dislocation through X-ray and CT imaging, emphasizing the importance of documenting such cases for better understanding and management, and noting the utility of CT scans for morphological analysis and surgical planning if required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.