Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41333971›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2025

The Role of Desmopressin in Kidney Biopsies: A Narrative Review.

Sheldon W Tobe, Raea Dobson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sheldon W TobeSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7848-3872
Raea DobsonSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3651-4690

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Desmopressin is a vasopressin analogue. In addition to its antidiuretic effects, it is also a procoagulant. While it is indicated to reduce bleeding in a variety of situations, it is not currently being utilized broadly for kidney biopsies, a procedure where bleeding is the most common complication. Purpose of Review: To discuss the evidence surrounding use of desmopressin for kidney biopsy. Sources of information: We conducted a search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CENTRAL (Wiley), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (Ovid), and Scopus databases. Methods: All identified trials were reviewed. Trials since the last systematic review in 2020 were organized in color-coded tables by efficacy, neutral results, or harm. Key Findings: Studies are generally favorable in terms of efficacy data for reduced bleeding during kidney biopsies, with some safety concerns. More studies are still needed, but we believe desmopressin can be justified to reduce bleeding complications of kidney biopsy in the setting of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Limitations: Trials involved small sample sizes, single-center data, and were largely observational in nature.

Indexed as

bleedingDDAVPdesmopressinkidney biopsy

Identifiers

PMID41333971
PMCPMC12665823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.