Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41333957›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Choledocholithiasis: Clinical Outcomes and Predictors of Complications.

Muhammad Khizar Badar, Jasim Ali, Baseera Imran, Muhammad Usama Rasheed, Muhammad Umar Kaleem, Ali Raza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad Khizar BadarInternal Medicine, Imran Idrees Teaching Hospital, Sialkot, PAK.
Jasim AliInternal Medicine, Aziz Bhatti Shaheed Teaching Hospital, Gujrat, PAK.
Baseera ImranPhysiology, Ameer-ud-Din Medical College, Lahore, PAK.
Muhammad Usama RasheedInternal Medicine, Farooq Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Muhammad Umar KaleemInternal Medicine, Akhtar Saeed Medical and Dental College, Lahore, PAK.
Ali RazaEmergency Medicine, Shalamar Hospital, Lahore, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Common bile duct (CBD) stones are a frequent cause of biliary obstruction and may lead to life-threatening complications such as cholangitis, pancreatitis, and obstructive jaundice if not promptly managed. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has largely replaced open and laparoscopic bile duct exploration as the preferred therapeutic approach due to its minimally invasive nature, shorter hospital stay, and high efficacy. However, its success and safety depend on multiple clinical and procedural factors that require evaluation in local settings. Objective This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of ERCP for CBD stones in terms of efficacy, complications, and recurrence and to identify factors associated with post-ERCP adverse events. Methods This retrospective observational study was conducted at Akhtar Saeed Trust Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from January 2022 to January 2025, including 129 patients who underwent ERCP for suspected or confirmed CBD stones. Demographic, clinical, and procedural data were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were calculated for continuous variables (mean ± SD) and categorical variables (n, %). Comparative analyses between patients with and without complications were performed using an independent-sample t-test, Chi-square, or Fisher's exact test, and binary logistic regression was applied to determine predictors of complications. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The mean age of patients was 52.6 ± 13.4 years, with 76 (58.9%) females. The most common presenting symptom was abdominal pain, 91 (70.5%), followed by jaundice, 66 (51.2%). Complete stone clearance was achieved in 116 patients (89.9%) during the first ERCP session. Post-ERCP complications occurred in 17 patients (13.2%), most commonly pancreatitis in nine patients (7.0%), bleeding in four (3.1%), cholangitis in three (2.3%), and perforation in one patient (0.8%). Multiple stones were significantly associated with complications (OR = 2.89, 95% CI = 1.05-7.98, p = 0.041), and a hospital stay of more than five days was strongly predictive of adverse outcomes (OR = 6.12, 95% CI = 1.98-18.9, p = 0.002). No procedure-related mortality occurred, and recurrence of CBD stones was observed in seven (5.4%) cases during follow-up. Conclusion ERCP is a highly effective and safe therapeutic modality for CBD stones, providing high clearance rates with acceptable complications and no mortality. The presence of multiple stones and prolonged hospitalization were associated with increased risk of adverse events. Outcomes were influenced by stone size, number, and complexity, highlighting the importance of individualized patient assessment and careful procedural planning. ERCP continues to serve as the cornerstone of choledocholithiasis management, offering shorter hospital stays, faster recovery, and lower morbidity compared to surgical alternatives.

Indexed as

common bile ductendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographylithotripsypancreatitisstenting

Identifiers

PMID41333957
PMCPMC12665873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.