Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41333841›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025

Measuring commercial cannabis availability: findings from a multi-state surveillance study in the US.

Nigar Nargis, Samuel Asare, J Lee Westmaas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nigar NargisTobacco Control Research, Surveillance, Prevention & Health Services Research (SPHeRe), American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4501-1398
Samuel AsareTobacco Control Research, Surveillance, Prevention & Health Services Research (SPHeRe), American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7888-0667
J Lee WestmaasTobacco Control Research, Surveillance, Prevention & Health Services Research (SPHeRe), American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6716-7695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cannabis legalization enables greater access to commercial cannabis among adults. Little is known about the extent to which demand for cannabis is met by licit or illicit markets among states with medical-only or recreational cannabis laws, or no legalization. Methods: Annual sales values of medical and recreational tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), illicit THC, hemp-derived cannabidiol (CBD) and hemp-derived THC were estimated for 2024 in 12 US states by combining and triangulating data from national- and state-level public sources, Euromonitor's Passport database, in-store audits ( Results: State-level THC market size was substantial, accounting for ≥90% of the combined cannabis market value of THC and CBD, regardless of legalization status. However, the composition of THC markets-across legal recreational, medical, illicit, and hemp-derived segments-varied considerably, even among states with the same legalization status. Conclusions: The emergence of hemp-derived THC in both legal and non-legal markets alongside the persistence of illicit THC sales in legal markets highlight regulatory gaps and challenges in market oversight. These findings underscore the need for integrated policy approaches that align enforcement strategies with public health objectives and consumer education.

Indexed as

commercial cannabishemp-derived cannabinoidillicit cannabismarket segmentstate cannabis legalizationtetrahydrocannabinolUSA

Identifiers

PMID41333841
PMCPMC12666535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.