ArticleJOR spine2025
Subject-Specific Musculoskeletal Modeling: The Future of Predicting and Preventing Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity.
Article in JOR spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proximal junctional kyphosis and failure risk around the thoracolumbar junction: Impact of anterior malalignment, pelvic retroversion, and upper instrumented level selection.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Subject-Specific Musculoskeletal Modeling: The Future of Predicting and Preventing Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity.JOR spine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is an increasingly prevalent disorder in the aging population. Surgical intervention is a common and generally effective treatment for severe cases. However, it is associated with relatively high rates of complications, one of the most common, and devastating of which is proximal junctional failure (PJF). PJF is characterized by symptomatic mechanical failure at the junction of the spinal fusion construct and the adjacent proximal mobile spinal segments, leading to a kyphotic deformity. Current Limitations: The etiology of PJF remains a topic of ongoing investigation, with uncertainty surrounding the specific factors that predispose individual patients to this complication. Current predictive models primarily rely on radiographic parameters on standing X-rays to assess PJF risk, but their clinical utility remains limited. We contend that these models universally fail to adequately account for the role of paraspinal muscle function and dysfunction, iatrogenic surgical muscle injury, bone quality, integrity of the discoligamentous elements, and spinal kinetics. Proposed Approach: Musculoskeletal modeling offers a powerful tool to enhance our understanding of human body kinetics and kinematics, including the complex biomechanical interactions in the spine. By integrating the biomechanical characteristics of bone and soft tissue into surgical treatment planning, we contend that subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling will improve PJF predictability, enable the explanation and interpretation of PJF, and ultimately optimize outcomes for patients undergoing surgery for ASD. Conclusion: Subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling represents a critical opportunity to address the limitations of existing predictive systems and advance the field of ASD management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.