ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
MRI-based radiomics model for predicting tumor regression patterns after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We investigated a predictive framework that integrates MRI-derived radiomic characteristics with clinical indicators to assess how breast tumors respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 301 patients with pathologically confirmed breast cancer. From their baseline MRI scans, 1,196 radiomic features were extracted. Feature reduction was carried out through ANOVA followed by LASSO regression to select the most relevant variables. Eight machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest and XGBoost, were used to develop predictive models incorporating both radiomic and clinical data. Patients were randomly divided into a training set ( Results: In performance evaluation, the Random Forest approach yielded area under the curve values of 0.82 for training and 0.75 for validation, reflecting consistent predictive strength. A nomogram constructed using the selected features achieved an AUC of 0.75 in the validation cohort, with a sensitivity of 0.64 and a specificity of 0.88. Conclusion: The integration of imaging biomarkers and clinical profiles enables reliable prediction of tumor response post-NAC, supporting more informed and tailored treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.