ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
The Metacognitive Enhancement Triad model enhances learning outcomes in first-year emergency medicine residents.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study evaluated the Metacognitive Enhancement Triad (MET) model, integrating peer-assisted learning (PAL), problem-based learning (PBL), and practice-enhanced cognitive learning (PCL), for improving first-year residents' learning outcomes and National Medical Licensing Examination (NMLE) performance. Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted at a tertiary academic medical center. 24 first-year residents received conventional training (pre-intervention), while 22 received the MET intervention (post-intervention). The MET model comprised: (1) PAL groups formed by diagnostic assessment; (2) Constructivist PBL sessions led by mentors; (3) Clinical rotations restructured to align with NMLE content (PCL). Primary outcomes were NMLE scores and pass rates. Secondary outcomes were self-reported competencies and satisfaction measured on a 10-point Likert scale. Results: The post-intervention cohort showed significantly higher NMLE scores (429 ± 41 vs. 388 ± 46, Conclusion: The MET model significantly enhanced NMLE performance and key competencies among first-year emergency medicine residents, offering an effective framework for residency training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.