ArticleVeterinary world2025
Development and evaluation of an experimental inactivated vaccine against lumpy skin disease.
Article in Veterinary world, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Lumpy skin disease (LSD), caused by the LSD virus (LSDV), results in severe economic losses, reduced productivity, and restricted livestock trade. Although live attenuated vaccines are available, they pose risks such as viral shedding, recombination, and reversion to virulence. Inactivated vaccines, being safer alternatives, are particularly suitable for disease-free regions. This study aimed to develop an inactivated oil-adjuvanted vaccine using a local LSDV isolate and evaluate its immunogenicity and protective efficacy in rabbits. Materials and Methods: Scab samples were collected from clinically suspected LSD cases, and LSDV was isolated through the chorioallantoic membrane route in embryonated chicken eggs. The virus was adapted to Madin-Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) cells, inactivated with binary ethyleneimine, and formulated with Montanide Immune System Activator 50 V2 adjuvant. Sterility and safety were evaluated in laboratory animals. Twenty-four rabbits were divided into three groups: Group A received the experimental inactivated vaccine intramuscularly, Group B received a commercial live attenuated vaccine subcutaneously, and Group C served as controls. Antibody responses were assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and virus neutralization tests. A challenge study with a virulent local LSDV strain was conducted to evaluate protective efficacy. Results: The inactivated vaccine elicited robust antibody responses, with ELISA sample-to-positive ratios increasing from 4.3% at baseline to 166.6% on day 42, compared with 210.1% in the live vaccine group and 6% in controls. Neutralizing antibody titers ranged from 1:32 to 1:128 (mean 1:80) in the inactivated group, compared with 1:32-1:256 (mean 1:148) in the live vaccine group, both surpassing the protective threshold (≥1:16). Post-challenge, the inactivated vaccine conferred 86% vaccine efficacy, with only mild clinical signs observed in one rabbit, while the control group developed typical LSD symptoms. No adverse reactions were recorded in vaccinated animals. Conclusion: The experimental inactivated oil-adjuvanted vaccine induced strong protective immunity in rabbits, comparable to the live attenuated vaccine but with an improved safety profile. Its inability to revert to virulence or transmit between animals makes it a promising candidate for large-scale use, especially in regions aiming to maintain disease-free status. Further evaluation in cattle under field conditions is warranted to confirm its long-term protective efficacy and potential for inclusion in control strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.