ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2026
Obstetric Emergency Preparedness in Arkansas Emergency Departments: Results From a Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This cross-sectional study of hospital emergency departments (EDs) in Arkansas sought to (1) assess ED experiences and capabilities related to obstetric emergencies and (2) characterize the differences in ED practices for pregnant and postpartum patients between hospitals with and without obstetric services. Methods: Online survey invitations were distributed to department managers at hospital EDs across Arkansas in August 2023. The 40-question survey collected hospital characteristics, ED experiences with and capacity to manage obstetric emergencies, and staff training history and interest. Responses were descriptively analyzed, and differences in proportions between hospitals with and without obstetric services were calculated. Results: Managers for 51 (61%) of the 84 eligible EDs responded. Seventy-one percent of EDs (35/49) had an urgent transport of a pregnant or postpartum patient, and 43% (20/47) had a birth in the prior 12 months. EDs in hospitals without obstetric services were less likely to report a birth (27% versus 56%), to have the capacity to perform some obstetric procedures such as administering uterotonic drugs (58% versus 100%), and to require assessment of postpartum status in the electronic health record (0% versus 33%). The majority (16/35; 46%) of responding ED managers had not offered obstetric emergency training to staff in the last 2 years. Conclusion: Although obstetric emergencies are not uncommon in the Arkansas hospital EDs represented in this study, many EDs have gaps in their preparedness to identify and manage these cases. Key opportunities for improving preparedness in this sample include training staff and requiring assessment of both pregnancy and postpartum status for women of reproductive age.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.