ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2025
Performance of individual audit filters in predicting opportunities for improvement in adult trauma patients.
Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical outcomes and opportunities for improvement across modified trauma quality improvement cohorts: a registry-based cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Happy birthday, dear TSACO: congratulations on the 10-year anniversary of Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open (TSACO).Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
- Audit filters: beyond linear assumption.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
- Audit filters: netting opportunities.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Trauma audit filters, based on standards of care, serve as quality indicators and screening tools for patient cases to be assessed at interdisciplinary morbidity and mortality conferences. These conferences aim to identify potential opportunities for improvement in the care of trauma patients. This study aimed to determine the performance of individual audit filters in predicting opportunities for improvement and their relevance as screening tools for morbidity and mortality conferences. Methods: We conducted a single-center registry-based retrospective cohort study based on registered data collected between 2013 and 2022 from the Karolinska University Hospital in Sweden. Performance was measured using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Matthews correlation coefficient for 10 audit filters used at the Karolinska University Hospital. Results: Our analysis included 8309 patients. Audit filters demonstrated inconsistent agreement with opportunities for improvement with a Matthews correlation coefficient ranging from -0.088 (95% CI -0.129 to -0.044) for "Injury Severity Score >15 and no team activation" to 0.092 (95% CI 0.058 to 0.126) for "> 60 min until first major intervention." The Matthews correlation coefficient for all audit filters combined was 0.118 (95% CI 0.104 to 0.131). Conclusion: No individual audit filter or combination thereof performed well in predicting opportunities for improvement, which suggests that the current method of screening for morbidity and mortality conferences should be revisited. Level of evidence: Level III, prognostic/epidemiological.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.