ArticleClinical kidney journal2025
Urgent initiation of hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis in severe hyperkalemia: a prospective study.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- [Consensus recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of hyperkalemia of the Austrian Society of Nephrology 2026].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In patients with incident end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), hyperkalemia (HyperK) is a common indication for initiating kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) both effectively reduce serum potassium, but HD is often considered superior due to its perceived faster efficiency. However, evidence supporting this perception remains limited. We hypothesized that HD and PD would be equally effective for the management of severe HyperK during hospitalization. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study at the Nephrology Department of Hospital Civil de Guadalajara. Consecutive, dialysis-naïve patients hospitalized with ESKD and severe HyperK (serum potassium >6.5 mEq/L at admission) between 2022 and 2024 were included. The modality of KRT (HD vs PD) was determined by the treating nephrology team. The primary outcome was the trajectory of serum potassium reduction between groups. Secondary outcomes included daily potassium trajectory, catheter dysfunction, length of stay and mortality. Results: Eighty-two patients were included: 34 initiated PD, 37 HD and 11 received conservative management. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar across groups ( Conclusions: In this prospective cohort of ESKD patients with severe HyperK, both PD and HD achieved comparable potassium reduction and clinical outcomes, supporting PD as an effective alternative for urgent-start KRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.