ArticleJugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong2023
[The Nation Public Awareness on Medical Radiation Using Structural Equations Model].
Article in Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we surveyed 3,000 Korean to determine the level of awareness of medical radiation and to analyze the structural relationships of medical radiation awareness. The results showed that the majority of respondents recognized the benefits of medical radiation, but their awareness of the risks and management of radiation was relatively low. In addition, the percentage of respondents who had received information about radiation was low, and their trust in media communication for medical radiation was moderate. Compared to the 2009 survey, there was a significant increase in the perceived risk of medical radiation from 3.37 point to 3.41 point, and a significant increase in perceived management from 2.73 point to 3.67 point. However, the provision of risk information is still insufficient and the level of correct knowledge is low. In addition, YouTube accounts for 35.5% of information sources, and the demand for providing dose information after radiation examination is high at 79.2%. The structural relationship of perceptions showed that benefit and benefit loss were relatively less affected by risk, but more affected by management. Based on the results, we proposed a roadmap for the safety management of medical radiation for patients, which aims to promote the safe use of medical radiation and healthy medical care for the national public people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.