ArticleConsortium psychiatricum2025
Comparative Visual Perception Patterns in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Mild Intellectual Disability: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Consortium psychiatricum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVisual perception plays a crucial role in cognitive and behavioral development. Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and mild intellectual disability (ID) exhibit distinct patterns of visual processing that influence their learning and interaction with the environment.
aimThis study aims to compare the visual perception abilities of children with ASD and those with mild ID.
methodsThis study employed an experimental comparative design. The Bender Visual-Motor Gestalt Test was administered to assess visual-motor integration, perceptual organization, and spatial processing abilities. It was scored based on standard qualitative and quantitative criteria. Group comparisons were conducted using descriptive statistics and cross-group performance patterns.
resultsA total of 15 children (8 with ASD and 7 with mild ID), aged between 7 to 12 years, participated in the study. Children with ASD demonstrated superior spatial organization and attention to local details, whereas children with mild ID demonstrated significant difficulties in perceptual coherence, spatial alignment, and motor coordination.
conclusionThe study highlights the importance of developing tailored intervention strategies that address the distinct perceptual processing styles associated with ASD and mild ID. However, limitations such as a lack of detailed diagnostic criteria, absence of symptom severity differentiation, and failure to control for developmental age must be considered when interpreting the findings. Future research should aim to overcome these limitations by including standardized diagnostic measures, creating a larger and more diverse sample, and involving additional assessment tools for a more comprehensive analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.