ArticleClinical epidemiology2025
Discriminative Ability of the Charlson Comorbidity Index for Long-Term Mortality in a General Population: Nationwide, Population-Based Study of 10 Million Adults in Sweden.
Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing versus usual care in diagnostic colorectal cancer screening: the SCREESCO randomized controlled trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Integrated Risk Stratification Using Comorbidity Burden, Frailty, and Systemic Inflammation to Predict 30-Day Mortality in Older Emergency Department Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comorbidity-adjusted life expectancy using comprehensive summary measures of medical history: nationwide, population-based study in Sweden.European journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is widely used to control confounding factors in epidemiological studies. There is a need to characterize the performance of CCI in a contemporary general population. This study assessed the discriminative ability of CCI for long-term mortality in relation to age, sex, data source, length of look-back period, and calendar time. Methods: Open cohort study of all adults residing in Sweden for at least one year between 2003 and 2022. Multiple versions of the CCI were calculated based on 1-10 years of lookback in the Swedish National Patient Register. Discrimination was determined using the concordance index (C-index). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to describe 10-year survival. Results: About 10395689 unique individuals had a median follow-up for mortality of 10 years. The C-index of CCI increased with the length of the look-back period, from 0.694 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.694-0.694) at 1 year, to 0.784 (95% CI, 0.783-0.784) at 5 years, and to 0.808 (95% CI, 0.807-0.808) at 10 years. Discrimination was highest in subjects aged 60 years, for whom the discrimination of CCI Conclusion: The CCI discriminated risk of death best using a look-back period of at least 5 years and performed better in women than in men in most age groups. Our findings offer insights into both the practical utility of the CCI and the interpretation of studies in which it has been applied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.