Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41333606›Full record

ReviewJugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong2023

[Changes in the Domestic Tobacco Market and Tobacco Products, and Challenges to Prepare Strategies for Response].

Sungkyu Lee, Yejeong Kim, Jinyoung Kim, Susan Park, Sung-Il Cho

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sungkyu Lee한국담배규제연구교육센터.
Yejeong Kim한국담배규제연구교육센터.
Jinyoung Kim한국담배규제연구교육센터.
Susan Park서울대학교 보건환경연구소.
Sung-Il Cho서울대학교 보건환경연구소.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the range of tobacco products diversifies, the perception that "tobacco=cigarette" remains unchanged, which calls for changes in tobacco control policies. This study focuses on identifying the types and characteristics of tobacco products besides cigarettes available and used in Republic of Korea (ROK), as well as anticipating products that are likely to enter the country in the future. The study investigated the official websites and social media channels of major tobacco manufacturers and analyzed recently sold electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) by visiting offline stores. New tobacco products have been launched using marketing messages like odor reduction and reduced harm, while smokeless tobacco products are sold in various types. Tobacco companies are using "smoke-free" expressions to describe the lower risk of new tobacco products compared to conventional cigarettes. The devices of heated tobacco products provide a cleaner and more convenient smoking experience, with a growing number of flavors. E-cigarettes have become very diverse, with over 40 types of devices and 200 types of liquids sold in a single store, classified according to the method of inhaling, nicotine content, and flavor and aroma. Future tobacco products anticipated in ROK is "nicotine pouch" which is similar to snus and contains nicotine powder instead of tobacco leaves. The emergence of such new tobacco products will bring changes in the tobacco use behavior of Korean smokers who frequently use multiple tobacco products, and as there is a possibility that new health hazards may occur as a result, regulatory policies should be prepared by creating scientific evidence such as health impact studies.

Indexed as

Electronic cigarettesSmokeless tobaccoSmokingTobacco

Identifiers

PMID41333606
PMCPMC12479766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.