ArticleFrontiers in health services2025
Cross-sectional analysis of delays in care and interactions with healthcare providers among transgender and gender diverse individuals.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Timely access to positive, culturally competent healthcare experiences may be critical for transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals. However, gaps remain in our understanding of TGD individuals' access to these experiences. Our aim was to determine whether TGD individuals' likelihood of reporting delays in care and positive healthcare provider interactions differs from that of cisgender people. Methods: We analyzed survey data from 89,133 participants who enrolled in the National Institutes of Health's All of Us Research Program from 5/6/2018 to 4/1/2021. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regressions were performed to assess the association of gender with delays in care in the past 12 months and provider interactions. Results: After adjustment, TGD individuals were more likely than cisgender men to report eight of nine reasons for care delays and more likely than cisgender women to report two of nine reasons. TGD individuals were more likely than cisgender men (OR: 2.20, 95% CI: 1.88-2.58, Conclusion: Our findings indicate that TGD individuals may be more likely than cisgender people to experience delays in care and less likely to experience positive healthcare provider interactions. This suggests a critical need to increase TGD individuals' access to supportive, culturally competent healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.