ReviewJugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong2024
[The Comparison of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine Adverse Events between Korea and the UK and Implications for Vaccine Adverse Event Management System].
Review in Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Varicella Vaccine Safety: Absence of Evidence Is Not Evidence of Absence.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination programs in the Republic of Korea (ROK) and the United Kingdom (UK) have been successfully implemented by providing the most available vaccines in a timely manner. Both countries have collected post-vaccination adverse event (AE) data to continuously monitor evolving vaccine safety, and the cumulative number of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) obtained in the two countries has exceeded 0.48 million in total, respectively. The numbers of AEs per ICSR and AE types as well as the probability of having a serious AE per ICSR were lower in the ROK than in the UK. These findings could imply that the ROK might have adopted different standards and processes from those in the UK. For example, there were marked inter-country differences in acceptable reporter types, seriousness criteria, causality assessment criteria, and AE coding system, which could have resulted from the low level of acceptance of internationally recognized pharmacovigilance principles in the ROK. The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines are widely adopted by national regulatory authorities in many countries including the United States, European Union countries, and the UK, with research institutions and pharmaceutical companies being no exception. The ROK needs to improve the Adverse Event Following Immunization management system to practice more effective and sustainable vaccine safety monitoring by adopting ICH guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.