Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41333484›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Ensuring Justification for Head CT Scans in Patients With Head Injuries According to 2023 National Institute of Excellence Guidelines at a Tertiary Care Center in Baghdad, Iraq: A Clinical Audit.

Sarmad Al-Hilfi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sarmad Al-HilfiDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Basra, Basra, IRQ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective To evaluate adherence to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines in ordering computed tomography (CT) head scans for patients presenting with head trauma at the emergency department at the Teaching Hospital in Baghdad. Methodology A clinical audit was conducted in two cycles at the Radiology Department of the Teaching Hospital. Data were collected from the head CT request forms for patients presenting with head trauma to the emergency room. In the first cycle, data were gathered retrospectively over a month in January 2025. The data were then examined and analyzed, and interventions were implemented to enhance quality and outcomes. The second cycle was conducted to objectively evaluate the success of these interventions over a one-month period (May 2025). Results In cycle one, 144 patients were included, with 77.08% of their requests failing to comply with the NICE guidelines. After implementing the interventions, 28.44% of the 102 patients in the second cycle showed no definitive indications. The interventions significantly reduced requests that fell outside of the NICE guidelines. Conclusion The adherence to NICE guidelines for justifying head CT scans for head injury was inadequate and was significantly improved after implementing simple interventions.

Indexed as

clinical auditct scan heademergency neurosurgeryguideline adherenceneuroimagingradiologytraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID41333484
PMCPMC12667221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.