Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41333464›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

EASIX, a new tool to predict response and refractoriness in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Silvia Escribano-Serrat, María Queralt Salas, Cristina Pascual-Izquierdo, Manuel Fernández Villalobos, Inés Gómez-Seguí, Teresa Fidalgo, Marta Fernández Docampo, Jorge Martínez Nieto, Óscar Lamas, Miquel Lozano and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Silvia Escribano-SerratLaboratory of Hemostasis and Erythropathology, Hematopathology, Pathology Department, CDB, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
María Queralt SalasHematopoietic Transplantation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, ICAMS, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina Pascual-IzquierdoHematology Department, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Fernández VillalobosHematology Department, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Inés Gómez-SeguíHematology Department, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Teresa FidalgoCentro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Marta Fernández DocampoÁrea de Gestión Integrada de A Coruña, Instituto de investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), A Coruña, Spain.
Jorge Martínez NietoHospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Óscar LamasHematology Department, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Miquel LozanoApheresis and Cellular Therapy Unit, Department of Hemotherapy and Hemostasis, ICAMS, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Joan CidApheresis and Cellular Therapy Unit, Department of Hemotherapy and Hemostasis, ICAMS, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Paola CharryApheresis and Cellular Therapy Unit, Department of Hemotherapy and Hemostasis, ICAMS, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Marc PinoLaboratory of Hemostasis and Erythropathology, Hematopathology, Pathology Department, CDB, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Patricia MolinaLaboratory of Hemostasis and Erythropathology, Hematopathology, Pathology Department, CDB, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Blanca De MonerLaboratory of Hemostasis and Erythropathology, Hematopathology, Pathology Department, CDB, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Álex RamosLaboratory of Hemostasis and Erythropathology, Hematopathology, Pathology Department, CDB, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana Belén Moreno-CastañoLaboratory of Hemostasis and Erythropathology, Hematopathology, Pathology Department, CDB, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Julia Martinez-SanchezLaboratory of Hemostasis and Erythropathology, Hematopathology, Pathology Department, CDB, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ginés EscolarLaboratory of Hemostasis and Erythropathology, Hematopathology, Pathology Department, CDB, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Maribel Díaz-RicartLaboratory of Hemostasis and Erythropathology, Hematopathology, Pathology Department, CDB, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy resulting from severe ADAMTS13 deficiency. Caplacizumab accelerates platelet recovery, but ~15% of patients remain refractory, and endothelial/microvascular injury or low ADAMTS13 activity may persist despite remission, highlighting the need for biomarkers. We evaluated the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX), an endothelial dysfunction surrogate, dynamics and ability to predict refractoriness and mortality in iTTP. Methods: Fifty-five adults receiving ≥2 therapies (corticosteroids, plasma exchange, rituximab, and/or caplacizumab) were studied. Clinical and laboratory data were collected at baseline, days 1-2, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and at treatment discontinuation, including clinical or ADAMTS13 relapses. EASIX was calculated at each time point; logistic regression and ROC analyses evaluated its predictive performance for refractoriness and mortality. Results: Median age was 47 years; 13% were refractory, and 7% died. In responders, EASIX dropped below 1 by day 7, earlier than ADAMTS13 recovery (day 21). Clinical relapses showed EASIX spikes (median 13.2), unlike ADAMTS13-only relapses. Baseline EASIX was higher in refractory patients (752 vs. 91; p=0.007), remaining elevated at days 7 and 14. Higher pre-treatment EASIX predicted refractoriness (OR = 1.003; p=0.021; AUC = 0.811; sensitivity 100%; specificity 58.7%) and mortality (OR = 1.004; p=0.027). Discussion: EASIX may help predict refractoriness and death, improving monitoring in iTTP.

Indexed as

Purpura, Thrombotic ThrombocytopenicADAMTS13 ProteinAdultAgedBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlasma ExchangePrognosisRituximabSingle-Domain AntibodiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultADAMTS13 ProteinADAMTS13 protein, humanBiomarkerscaplacizumabRituximabSingle-Domain AntibodiesADAMTS13 activitybiomarkerEASIXendothelial dysfunctionITTP

Identifiers

PMID41333464
PMCPMC12665919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.