Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41333455›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

The past, present, and future of anti-idiotype antibodies.

William J Murphy, Craig P Collins, Heinz Kohler

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William J MurphyDepartments of Dermatology and Internal Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University of California (UC) Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Craig P CollinsDepartments of Dermatology and Internal Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University of California (UC) Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Heinz KohlerDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seminal discoveries led to the concept of the immune system as a complex network of antibodies and B-cells. In 1963, Kunkel et al. described individual antigenic specificities using antibodies directed against antibodies, hinting at the possibility of a network structure in the immune repertoire. In 1973, Jerne proposed the Network Theory that the immune system is a functional network of antibodies (idiotypes) and anti-idiotypic antibodies that are made in response due to the inherent immunogenicity of immunoglobulin variable chains. In 1974, anti-idiotypic responses were observed, providing proof of the Network Theory. In this review, the origin, as well as rise and fall, of idiotype research over the years is traced, citing examples of work that expanded the understanding of the network concept and its potential application. This includes broadly binding anti-idiotypic antibodies, anti-idiotype vaccines, anti-idiotypic antibodies as tools to trace monoclonal antibodies, and as immunotherapeutic biologicals. Future utility from using the Network Theory could involve cocktails of different monoclonal anti-idiotypic monoclonals. Studies can focus on how the Network Theory involves the generation of potential "antigen mirror" effects and how the network ultimately regulates both B and T cell responses over time. Despite the decline in popularity, aspects of the Network Theory are reemerging as evidence is generated on potential roles during host responses to pathogens or vaccines.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Anti-IdiotypicAntibodies, MonoclonalImmunoglobulin IdiotypesAnimalsB-LymphocytesHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansAntibodies, Anti-IdiotypicAntibodies, MonoclonalImmunoglobulin Idiotypesanti-idiotype antibodieshistorical review and present situationimmune regulationimmunologyimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID41333455
PMCPMC12665528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.