ReviewJugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong2024
[Comparison of Chronic Disease Surveillance Systems in the Republic of Korea and Major Advanced Countries].
Review in Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic diseases are among the leading causes of death; their rising prevalence is attributed to aging populations and Westernized lifestyles. Effective chronic disease surveillance systems are critical for providing public health data and shaping policies. In the Republic of Korea (ROK), chronic disease surveillance is conducted through various surveys; however, coordination between these systems is limited because each one is managed independently by a different agency. In contrast, major countries, such as the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, operate integrated surveillance systems. These systems use well-coordinated data sources to produce various indicators, track trends over time, and generate regional and group-specific estimates. A comprehensive approach in these countries allows them to observe multiple dimensions of chronic diseases and health behaviors. ROK's fragmented system struggles with integration, making it less efficient in tracking chronic disease trends. To build a more effective system, ROK should learn from the experiences of advanced countries by fostering stronger coordination with its surveillance systems. This approach would include integrating data sources and creating a centralized data portal for easy public access to chronic disease-related estimates, enabling more timely and effective public health responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.