ArticleResearch square2025
Deep Learning for Time-Series Segmentation of Mechanical Ventilator Waveforms.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of ventilator waveforms is essential for detecting patient-ventilator asynchronies (PVAs), yet current heuristic methods can fail in noisy, real-world data. We developed and validated a deep learning model using a one-dimensional attention-gated U-Net architecture to identify inspiratory and expiratory onsets in mechanical ventilation waveforms. The model was trained and tested on 9,719 breaths from 33 patients and outperformed published rule-based methods, achieving F1 scores of > 0.99 for both inspiratory and expiratory onset detection within a 0.1-second tolerance window. Performance remained robust in asynchronous breaths (F1 ≥ 0.98). When applied to quantify PVAs, the model reproduced reference standard asynchrony frequencies with no significant differences, whereas heuristic methods produced large deviations. Gradient-weighted class activation maps suggest that the model leveraged a diverse set of waveform features to inform segmentation. This computationally efficient model enables highly-accurate, real-time waveform analysis and provides a foundation for scalable, reproducible assessment of ventilator-patient interactions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.