Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41333422›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Perioperative Artificial Intelligence Driven Integrated Modeling of Surgeries using Anesthetic, Physical and Cognitive Statuses for Predicting Hospital Outcomes.

Sabyasachi Bandyopadhyay, Jiaqing Zhang, Ronald L Ison, Bhanu Prasad Cherukuvada, David J Libon, Patrick Tighe, Parisa Rashidi, Catherine Price

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sabyasachi BandyopadhyayStanford University.
Jiaqing ZhangUniversity of Florida.
Ronald L IsonUniversity of Florida.
Bhanu Prasad CherukuvadaUniversity of Florida.
David J LibonRowan University.
Patrick TigheUniversity of Florida.
Parisa RashidiUniversity of Florida.
Catherine PriceUniversity of Florida.

Funding

PRECEDE: PREsurgical Cognitive Evaluation via Digital clockfacEdrawingR01AG055337 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CATHERINE E PRICE, Parisa Rashidi · 2017 to 2026
$3.2M
White Matter Connectivity and PD Cognitive PhenotypesR01NS082386 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PRICE, CATHERINE E · 2013 to 2017
$2.3M
Perioperative Cognitive Anesthesia Network (PeCAN) Program for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related DementiasK07AG066813 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PRICE, CATHERINE E · 2020 to 2024
$810k
Perioperative Cognitive Anesthesia Network Extension for Socially Vulnerable Older AdultsK07AG073468 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI TIGHE, PATRICK J · 2021 to 2025
$774k
NIA NIH HHS K07 AG066813NIA NIH HHS K07 AG073468NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055337NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS082386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association between preoperative cognitive status and surgical outcomes is a critical yet scarcely explored area. We assessed how preoperative cognitive status, as measured by clock drawing tests, contributed to predicting length of hospital stay, charges, pain during follow-up, and 1-year mortality beyond intraoperative variables, demographics, physical status, and comorbidities. We expanded our analysis to 6 surgical groups where sufficient data was available. Clock drawings were represented by 10 constructional features discovered by a semi-supervised deep learning algorithm, validated to differentiate between dementia and non-dementia patients. Machine learning models were trained using 5-fold cross-validation to classify postoperative outcomes. Shapley Additive Explanations analysis was used to find the most predictive features. Our results showed that the perioperative cognitive dataset served as the best dataset for 12 of 18 possible surgery-outcome combinations. Interpretability analysis showed that surgery duration was the most significant predictor of adverse outcomes, followed by anesthetic concentration. Disruptions in baseline correlations between intraoperative variables revealed that low average blood pressure and high standard deviation of blood pressure predicted adverse outcomes. Among the clock features, clock size was the most significant predictor of adverse outcomes. Our findings have relevance for improving healthcare modeling and perioperative risk prediction.

Indexed as

clock drawing testinterpretabilitypreoperative statussemi-supervised deep learning

Identifiers

PMID41333422
PMCPMC12668169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.