ArticleResearch square2025
Estrogen Metabolism Pathways in Pregnancy and Subsequent Breast Cancer Risk: A Prospective Follow-up Study.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: In the years following pregnancy, breast cancer risk is elevated, particularly for hormone receptor negative (HR-) tumors. Exposure to high maternal circulating estrogens, when the breast is vastly remodeling in structure and morphology, has been associated with risk, particularly for HR-tumors. Estrogen metabolite profiles in nonpregnant women, notably the ratio of 2:16 hydroxylation (OH) pathway metabolites, are associated with postmenopausal breast cancer development; whether estrogen metabolism during pregnancy influences subsequent HR- breast cancer risk is unknown. Methods: Weconducted a population-based case-control study in women 19-39 years identified in the Finnish Maternity Cohort Biobank and linked with the Finnish Cancer Registry to identify breast cancer diagnoses within 20 years of pregnancy. Estrogens and metabolites were measured using highly reliable and sensitive LC-MS/MS methods in serum collected during the first and second trimesters of pregnancy. Included were invasive, ER-/PR- breast cancer cases (n=449) and controls (n=449) matched on maternal age at index pregnancy, parity, calendar year of serum collection, gestational week of blood collection, and number of freeze/thaw cycles. Associations between estrogens and breast cancer risk were estimated using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from conditional logistic regression models. Results: The median years of follow-up between blood collection and breast cancer diagnosis/control selection was 9 (range 0-19). Total estrogens were positively associated with ER-/PR- breast cancer (OR associated with a doubling of total estrogens 1.16; 95% CI 1.02-1.32), as were metabolites in the 16-pathway including estriol [OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.01-1.22], 16-epiestriol [OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.01-1.21)], 17-epiestriol [OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01-1.13], and total 16-hydroxylation pathway metabolites [OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.00-1.24]. There was no clear association with the ratio of 2:16 hydroxylation pathway metabolites. Some associations differed by parity, age at diagnosis, and gestational timing of blood collection, but interactions were not statistically significant. Results were similar when restricted to cases occurring within 15 years since pregnancy. Conclusion: This prospective study demonstrated positive associations of estrogen metabolites in pregnancy and risk of ER-/PR- breast cancer, but the magnitudes varied by metabolite. No strong or consistent pattern for one metabolic pathway emerged suggesting that total estrogen concentrations during pregnancy are associated with subsequent HR- breast cancer development, regardless of how they are metabolized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.