Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41333381›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

"It's coming whether we want it to or not": A qualitative exploration of older adults' comfort with and perceptions of technology and digital health.

Anjali Vasavada, Lorella Palazzo, Casey Luce, Magali Sanchez, Matthew Triplette, James D Ralston, Lisa Carter-Bawa, Beverly B Green, Hongyuan Gao, Christopher I Li and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05747443 (Multilevel Interventions to Increase Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05747443 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Multilevel Interventions to Increase Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2022 to 2026Enrolled1,837ConditionsLung Cancer, Lung Cancer ScreeningArmsStepped Reminders, Patient Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Anjali VasavadaUniversity of Washington School of Public Health.
Lorella PalazzoKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute.
Casey LuceKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute.
Magali SanchezUniversity of Washington School of Public Health.
Matthew TripletteFred Hutchinson Cancer Center.
James D RalstonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute.
Lisa Carter-BawaHackensack Meridian Health.
Beverly B GreenUniversity of Washington School of Public Health.
Hongyuan GaoKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute.
Christopher I LiUniversity of Washington School of Public Health.
Melissa L AndersonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute.
Yu-Ru SuKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute.
Kristine RogersKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute.
Karen J WernliKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute.

Funding

Patient Provider Communication Larch SupplementR01CA262015 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WERNLI, KAREN J · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA262015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Older adults bear a disproportionate cancer burden but remain underrepresented in digital health intervention trials compared to younger counterparts. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, engagement with telemedicine and patient portals through the electronic health record (EHR) has grown for all age groups, suggesting readiness to adopt digital health tools. This qualitative study primarily sought to understand how adults eligible for lung cancer screening (LCS) engage with technology and digital health in their daily lives. The secondary objective was to assess acceptability and compatibility of a video-based LCS health communication as a digital health tool. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 participants aged 51-80 through videoconferencing or telephone. Transcripts were analyzed using a rapid team-based analysis approach. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used as a guiding framework from throughout the study, with constructs of interest informing interview guide questions in data collection, and CFIR-mapping to generate a code list in the analysis. Results: Our findings generated four CFIR-informed themes, with 8 subthemes: 1) Internal facilitators: comfort with technology, self-efficacy in troubleshooting; 2) External facilitators: leveraging internet for health information, use of wearable devices, patient portal functionalities; 3) Internal barriers: emotional response, social isolation; 4) External barriers: scamming and data privacy. When shown the LCS video-based health communication, participants described general approval of the content and delivery but expressed concerns about safety related to accessing the video due to its delivery via weblink. Conclusions: Broadly, we found that older adults had high levels of technology use and leveraged various digital tools (such as wearable devices, mobile applications, and EHR patient portals) to manage their health care needs. Our findings underscore that older adults are active users of digital tools, yet persistent concerns about privacy, social isolation, and emotional burden must be addressed for digital health interventions to be acceptable and sustainable in this population. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05747443; 2023-02-17.

Indexed as

digital healthlung cancer screeningolder adultstechnology

Identifiers

PMID41333381
PMCPMC12668164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.