ArticleEcancermedicalscience2025
Time toxicity in cancer treatment: oncologists' knowledge and practices across Pakistan.
Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Time Toxicity in Advanced Breast Cancer: Psychological Burden, Psychiatric Vulnerability, and Implications for Patient-Centered Decision-Making.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Time toxicity refers to the considerable time investment required by patients undergoing cancer treatment, including travel, waiting periods and treatment duration. It is increasingly recognised not only as a logistical burden but also as a psychological stressor, significantly affecting patient well-being. Objectives: This study surveyed oncologists across Pakistan to assess their understanding of time toxicity and its impact on both patients and clinical practice. Methods: From August to October 2023, we conducted a cross-sectional study targeting a diverse group of cancer care professionals including medical oncologists, clinical hematologists, radiation oncologists and palliative care physicians - across various healthcare centers in Pakistan. An online questionnaire was used to gather insights into their perspectives on time toxicity. Results: Over 54% of oncologists had a basic understanding of time toxicity, with 83.6% recognising its importance in cancer care. However, 69% noted that patients were poorly informed and often did not consider time burden in decision-making. About 45% of patients spent more than 10 hours per week on care-related activities. Key factors influencing time toxicity included cancer type, stage and logistical challenges. Notably, 85% of oncologists reported modifying treatment plans to reduce this burden. Strategies included offering chemotherapy services closer to patients' homes, using telemedicine for consultations and proactively managing side effects. The psychological toll of time-consuming schedules was also acknowledged by respondents. Conclusion: Time toxicity poses a substantial burden in cancer treatment, both practically and psychologically. Enhancing healthcare providers' awareness, improving access to care and adopting patient-centered approaches can significantly improve patient outcomes and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.