ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Executive function and boredom in Japanese monolingual, Chinese monolingual, and Japanese-Chinese bilingual children.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study examined the relationship between executive function (EF) and boredom-related variables among lower-grade elementary school students, as well as potential differences in these relationships among Japanese (JP) monolingual, Chinese (CH) monolingual, and bilingual children. Methods: A total of 89 first- and second-grade students participated, including 31 JP monolinguals, 32 CH monolinguals, and 26 JP-CH bilinguals. Participants completed nonverbal and verbal EF tasks, after which their parents assessed their levels of boredom during the tasks, as well as their daily boredom proneness and ease of concentration. Results: Lower cognitive flexibility was associated with higher daily boredom proneness, regardless of demographic attributes. Among JP monolingual and bilingual children, although the multiple regression model predicting concentration was only marginally significant, girls and those with higher scores on the Japanese word reversal task, an indicator of working memory, tended to show greater ease of daily concentration. Boys were also found to be more prone to boredom during tasks. Conclusions: These findings suggest that students' EF abilities, particularly cognitive flexibility and, to a lesser extent, working memory, are more strongly related to daily dispositional tendencies toward boredom and concentration than to temporary boredom experienced during activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.