ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025
Benchmarking complete-to-partial point cloud registration techniques for laparoscopic surgery.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Registering a preoperative 3D model of an organ with its actual anatomy viewed from an intraoperative video is a fundamental challenge in computer-assisted surgery, especially for surgical augmented reality. To address this, we present a benchmark of state-of-the-art deep learning point-cloud registration methods, offering a transparent evaluation of their generalizability to surgical scenarios and establishing a robust guideline for developing advanced non-rigid algorithms. Methods: We systematically evaluate traditional and deep learning GMM-based, correspondence-based, correspondence-free, matching-based, and liver-specific point cloud registration approaches on two surgical datasets: a deformed IRCAD liver set and DePoll dataset. We also propose our complete-to-partial point cloud registration framework that leverages keypoint extraction, overlap estimation, and a Transformer-based architecture, culminating in competitive registration results. Results: Experimental evaluations on deformed IRCAD tests reveal that most deep learning methods achieve good registration performances with TRE<10 mm, MAE(R) < 4 and MAE(t)<5 mm. On DePoll, however, performance drops dramatically due to the large deformations. Conclusion: In conclusion, deep-learning rigid registration methods remain reliable under small deformations and varying partiality but lose accuracy when faced with severe non-rigid changes. To overcome this, future work should focus on building non-rigid registration architectures that preserve the strengths of self-, cross-attention and overlap modules while enhancing correspondence estimation to handle large deformations in laparoscopic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.