ArticleJugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong2024
[Hospital-level Medical Institution Infection Control Status Survey Operation System].
Article in Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Nationwide Survey on Infection Prevention and Control in Acute Care Hospitals of Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- [Medical Clinics Infection Control Status Survey Operation System].Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency established and implemented a standardized survey system to prepare basic data for formulating and evaluating policies to prevent healthcare-associated infections, that identified the status of infection control based on the results of statistical analysis. We developed a survey standardizing questionnaire to gather information on the prevention and control of infection in healthcare facilities and an online survey system. A field survey system was utilized to verify the reliability of the survey. The online survey was conducted by respondents filling out the questionnaire themselves (computer-assisted self interviewing). Thereafter, some of the respondents from the online survey were randomly selected for a field survey where professional investigators visited the hospitals, and the limitations of the online survey were complemented. In the first survey on acute-care hospital infection control survey in 2021, 1,197 out of 1,767 hospitals (67.7%) participated in the online survey, and the field survey was conducted in 125 hospitals. In the survey on long-term care hospital infection control survey in 2022, 1,270 out of 1,365 hospitals (93.0%) participated in the online survey, and the field survey was conducted in 140 hospitals. The concordance (Gwet's AC1) between online survey responses and field survey results ranged from 0.52 to 0.92. The survey system was established initially to identify the status of infection control in healthcare facilities after the revision of the Infectious Disease Prevention Act made it mandatory to investigate infection control. The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency will establish and regularize this survey as a national survey system by improving on the limitations found in the first hospital-level healthcare institution survey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.