ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Real-time colonoscopic detection and precise segmentation of colorectal polyps via PESNet.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Precise and timely visual assistance is critical for detecting and completely removing colorectal cancer precursor polyps, a key step in preventing interval cancer and reducing patient morbidity. Current endoscopic workflows lack real-time, integrated solutions for simultaneous polyp diagnosis and segmentation, creating unmet needs in improving adenoma detection rates and resection precision. Methods: We propose PESNet, a real-time assistance framework for standard endoscopy workstations. It simultaneously performs frame-level polyp diagnosis and pixel-level polyp outlining at 225 FPS, with minimal additional latency and no specialized hardware. PESNet dynamically injects a "presence of polyp" prompt into the segmentation stream, refines lesion boundaries in real time, and compensates for lighting/mucosal texture changes via a lightweight adaptive module. Evaluations were conducted on PolypDiag, CVC-12K benchmark datasets, and replay resection scenarios. Latency was measured using TensorRT FP16 on an RTX 6000 Ada GPU. Results: On PolypDiag and CVC-12K, PESNet improved diagnostic F1 from 95.0% to 97.2% and segmentation Dice from 85.4% to 89.1%. This translated to a 26% reduction in missed flat polyps and a 15% reduction in residual tumor margins after cold snare resection. End-to-end latency (1080p) was 12.6 ± 0.3 ms per frame, with segmentation (4.4 ms), prompt fusion (0.6 ms), and prototype lookup (< 0.2 ms) all satisfying a 40 ms clinical budget with > 3× headroom. Discussion: These clinically significant improvements demonstrate PESNet's potential to enhance adenoma detection rates, support cleaner resection margins, and ultimately reduce colorectal cancer incidence during routine endoscopic examinations. Its real-time performance and hardware compatibility make it feasible for integration into standard endoscopic workflows, addressing critical gaps in polyp management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.