ArticleJugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong2025
[Current Hepatitis C Status among People Who Use Drugs in the Republic of Korea].
Article in Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: While the number of persons who use drugs (PWUD) in the Republic of Korea (ROK) is increasing, studies on hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among this population are scarce. We investigated HCV prevalence and treatment rates among PWUD. Methods: Between August 2022 and May 2024, 342 PWUD from four hospitals were prospectively enrolled in this study. These four hospitals cover 95% of PWUD care in ROK. All participants underwent blood testing and completed questionnaires. Participants whose HCV antibody (anti-HCV) test result was positive underwent a reflex test for HCV RNA. Participants were divided into persons who inject drugs (PWID) and non-PWID groups based on their use of drugs by injection. Results: PWID and non-PWID groups comprised 92.1% and 7.9% of total patients, respectively (median age, 46 years; 76.0% male). In the PWID group, respective anti-HCV and HCV RNA prevalences were 32.4% and 11.1%. In the non-PWID group, respective anti-HCV and HCV RNA prevalences were 18.5% and 3.7%. HCV RNA positivity independently associated with sharing of syringes (odds ratio [OR] 3.300, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.236-8.850) and piercings performed before 1992 (OR 8.336, 95% CI 1.654-42.008, p=0.010). Among anti-HCV-positive patients, HCV infection awareness was 74.8%, and their treatment rate was 53.3%. The only independent factor associated with treatment history was knowledge on the HCV infection (OR 5.076, 95% CI 1.328-12.231, p=0.018). In the PWID and non-PWID groups with anti-HCV positivity, 34.3% and 20.0%, respectively, remained HCV RNA-positive due to untreated hepatitis C. Conclusions: Anti-HCV seropositivity and HCV RNA positivity were high in both PWID and non-PWID groups compared to general population, and these patients' access to care was insufficient. It is thus necessary to develop strategies to increase HCV treatment access for PWUD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.