ReviewJugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong2023
[Trends in Intervention Research for Reducing Health Effects of Particulate Matter].
Review in Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Air pollution, especially particulate matter (PM), is one of the major public health risk factors. More than 91% of the global population lives in areas where air pollution exceeds the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended limits. WHO estimated that air pollution is responsible for approximately 4.2 million deaths every year. PM has serious effects on health outcomes (especially in respiratory and cardiovascular diseases and all-cause morbidity). However, there are few intervention studies on the reduction of PM-exposure related health effects. Currently, air purifiers, masks, behavior and other interventions, diet and medications are the recommended interventions for reducing the effect of PM on health; however, scientific evidence for the effects of these interventions are lacking. Here, we review the intervention studies on PM and aim to identify the recent research trends. Using air purifiers significantly lowered the concentration of PM, resulting in a decrease in inflammation and blood pressure. Similarly, wearing a mask showed changes in lung function and blood pressure; however, there was no remarkable changes in the effects on the cardiovascular system. Therefore, intervention studies are limited and more research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.