Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41333162›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

Maximum entropy models of neuronal populations at and off criticality.

T S A N Simões, F Lombardi, D Plenz, H J Herrmann, L de Arcangelis

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

T S A N SimõesUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Department of Mathematics and Physics, Caserta, Viale Lincoln, 5, 81100, Italy.
F LombardiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova 35131, Italy.
D PlenzSection on Critical Brain Dynamics, National Institute of Mental Health, Porter Neuroscience Research Center, Rm 3A-1000, 35 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
H J HerrmannUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Física, Fortaleza, Ceará, 60451-970, Brazil.
L de ArcangelisUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Department of Mathematics and Physics, Caserta, Viale Lincoln, 5, 81100, Italy.

Funding

Neuronal Avalanches in the NeocortexZIAMH002797 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI PLENZ, DIETMAR · 2009 to 2025
$32.3M
BRAIN project (Plenz): Readout and Control of Spatiotemporal Neuronal Codes of BehaviorZIAMH002971 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI PLENZ, DIETMAR · 2019 to 2023
$882k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002797Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Empirical evidence of scaling behaviors in neuronal avalanches suggests that neuronal populations in the brain operate near criticality. Departure from scaling in neuronal avalanches has been used as a measure of distance to criticality and linked to brain disorders. A distinct line of evidence for brain criticality has come from thermodynamic signatures in maximum entropy (ME) models. Both of these approaches have been widely applied to the analysis of neuronal data. However, the relationship between deviations from avalanche criticality and thermodynamics of ME models of neuronal populations remains poorly understood. To address this question, we study spontaneous activity of organotypic rat cortex slice cultures in physiological and drug-induced hypo- or hyper-excitable conditions, which are classified as critical, subcritical and supercritical based on avalanche dynamics. We find that ME models inferred from critical cultures show signatures of criticality in thermodynamic quantities, e.g. specific heat. However, such signatures are also present, and equally strong, in models inferred from supercritical cultures-despite their altered dynamics and poor functional performance. On the contrary, ME models inferred from subcritical cultures do not show thermodynamic hints of criticality. Importantly, we confirm these results using an interpretable neural network model that can be tuned to and away from avalanche criticality. Our findings indicate that maximum entropy models correctly distinguish subcritical from critical/supercritical systems. However, they may not be able to discriminate between avalanche criticality and supercriticality, although they may still capture a number of important features from neuronal data.

Identifiers

PMID41333162
PMCPMC12668028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.