ArticleJugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong2025
[Comparison of Rapid Diagnostic Tests for the Detection of
Article in Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Malaria is an acute febrile disease caused by infections transmitted by mosquitoes. Among the five types of malaria parasites capable of infecting humans, Methods: Positive samples confirmed by nested PCR were used to calculate the rate of parasitemia based on the cycle threshold value of real-time PCR. Results: The comparative test results of the kits showed that the sensitivity of each kit ranged from 70.9% to 96.5%, and in particular, samples with a low rate of parasitemia had differences in sensitivity from 43.8% to 93.8%. However, specificity was confirmed to be 100.0% for all kits. Conclusions: The results of this study provide the information necessary for product selection by identifying differences in the effectiveness of RDTs used for the presumptive diagnosis of malaria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.