Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41333108›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Usability testing of the Pathway app: engaging stakeholders to improve access to mental health support for students.

Olugbenga Oti, Sarah Foley, Ian Pitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olugbenga OtiInsight Centre for Data Analytics, School of Computer Science & IT, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Sarah FoleySchool of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Ian PittInsight Centre for Data Analytics, School of Computer Science & IT, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mental health difficulties are highly prevalent among university students. Evidence shows that a majority of university students do not seek professional mental health support for their difficulties. Help-seeking technologies provide an opportunity to facilitate students' access to suitable services. This study aims to evaluate the usability of the Pathway prototype, which helps students find support that fits their needs and preferences. Methods: We conducted three cycles of usability testing with 26 participants comprising students, experts and stakeholders. Students were asked to "think aloud" as they completed tasks using the Pathway prototype. In addition, they were asked to complete the Single Ease Question and rate their experience of using the prototype. Experts and stakeholders were asked to provide feedback following a presentation of the app. The data were analysed using a table of changes approach, thematic analysis and descriptive quantitative analysis. Results: Following each usability testing cycle, several changes were made to the Pathway prototype. Participants reported that Pathway was a useful app to help students find appropriate support. Conclusion: In comparing Pathway to current methods of searching for support, students believed that Pathway was quicker, more trustworthy and provided more privacy in searching for support.

Indexed as

help-seekinghelp-seeking technologymental healthuniversity studentsusability

Identifiers

PMID41333108
PMCPMC12665652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.