ReviewJugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong2025
[Status of Tuberculosis Vaccines Development in Clinical Trials].
Review in Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- HowVaccines · 2026Review
- [Commemoration of the Special Issue on Tuberculosis in "Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong · 2025Article
- [Commemorating the 15th Tuberculosis Prevention Day: Challenges and Achievements of Republic of Korea's Tuberculosis Control Policies].Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death worldwide before the corona virus pandemic, but the only licensed vaccine to date is Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). This manuscript aims to introduce the current status and trends of clinical research on TB vaccines, one of the most difficult vaccines to develop. Methods: To identify the current status of clinical development, we reviewed the literature on TB vaccine candidates currently in the clinical pipeline and the World Health Organization (WHO) reports on the introduction of new vaccine developments. Results: As of September 2024, 15 TB vaccines candidates are in the clinical pipeline. Across vaccine platforms, six whole-cell, five recombinant protein, two viral vector-based, and two mRNA vaccines are in clinical development, with the largest number of candidates being whole-cell-based vaccines. As of 2024, two mRNA vaccines are also in Phase 1 clinical trials. WHO predicts that a new TB vaccine will be available within five years. The recombinant protein-based M72/AS01 Conclusions: While several platform-based TB vaccine candidates are in clinical trials; however, the antigens contained in these candidates are often redundant and limited. To diversify the TB vaccine clinical pipeline, it is necessary to continue research to identify new antigens, the development of preclinical animal models for efficacy evaluation, and the identification of valid endpoints through the analysis of clinical trial results are necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.