ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025
Comparison of Maternal Outcomes Between Cesarean Hysterectomy and Wedge Resection in Pregnant Women with Figo Grade 2 Placenta Accreta Spectrum.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare maternal outcomes between cesarean hysterectomy and wedge resection in pregnant women diagnosed with FIGO grade 2 placenta accrete spectrum (PAS). Methods: This retrospective cohort study with a cross-sectional design included pregnant women diagnosed with FIGO grade 2 PAS by ultrasonography who underwent either cesarean hysterectomy or wedge resection at Hasan Sadikin General Hospital between 2022-2025. The maternal outcomes analyzed included the amount of bleeding, duration of surgery, and the need for transfusion. Statistical analyses were conducted using the chi-square test (p <0.05). Results: A total of 83 patients were included, 49 patients underwent cesarean hysterectomy and 34 wedge resection. Based on the characteristics of the study participants, no significant differences were found in age or parity between the groups. Patients in the wedge resection group had significantly shorter operative duration and lower amount of bleeding compared with the hysterectomy group (p<0.05). Transfusion requirements of <4 units were comparable (63% vs 62%, x Conclusion: Both WR and CH are viable surgical options for FIGO grade 2 PAS. The increasing incidence of PAS is associated with previous cesarean section and multiparity. WR was associated with a shorter duration of surgery than CH. However, differences in blood loss and transfusion requirements were not statistically significant. These findings highlight the importance of individualized surgical planning and the potential role of postoperative management in optimizing maternal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.