Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41332980›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Impact of Intraocular Lens Design on Refractive Endpoint Selection: A Call for a New Paradigm.

Janusz Skrzypecki, Joanna Przybek-Skrzypecka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Janusz SkrzypeckiDepartment of Experimental Physiology and Pathophysiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Joanna Przybek-SkrzypeckaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6310-7516

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As intraocular lens (IOL) technology continues to evolve, the selection of an optimal refractive target has become increasingly complex and critical to achieving patient satisfaction following cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange. A recently proposed classification system divides IOLs into partial- and full-range-of-field categories based on defocus curve characteristics. However, this framework does not fully capture the diversity of modern IOL designs or account for key optical factors such as spherical aberration and lens-specific tolerance to residual refractive error. This review highlights the importance of understanding the interaction between IOL optical properties-particularly spherical aberration profiles-and refractive target strategies. It examines how different IOL designs, including enhanced monofocal, extended depth-of-field (EDOF), and full-range-of-vision lenses (eg, multifocal or spiral optics), respond to various refractive targets. The evidence suggests that a universal refractive target (eg, plano) may be suboptimal for many advanced IOLs and that customized refractive planning-often incorporating mini-monovision or asymmetrical targets-can improve visual outcomes. Future research should aim to standardize defocus measurement techniques and refine classification systems to better guide clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

depth of fielddepth of focusintraocular lensmonovosion

Identifiers

PMID41332980
PMCPMC12667411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.