Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41332967›Full record

ArticleRadiology case reports2026

Differentiating between benign and malignant bone lesions: The value of using SPECT/CT.

Joe Steinman, Arbaaz Patel, Katherine A Zukotynski

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joe SteinmanMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, L8S 4L8, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Arbaaz PatelDepartment of Medical Imaging, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Katherine A ZukotynskiDepartment of Medical Imaging, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two cases are presented; in each case a patient with a known cancer history was imaged with combined single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computed tomography (CT) to evaluate suspected bone pathology. While SPECT detected focal increased radiotracer uptake in the iliac bone in both patients, CT suggested a distinct etiology. In one case, the bone abnormality included lytic cortical bone destruction with soft tissue extending beyond the confines of the bone, consistent with osseous metastasis. In the other case there was loss of bone cortical integrity but an otherwise preserved cortical margin, lack of soft tissue involvement, and intralesional fat suggestive of a benign intraosseous lipoma. These two cases underscore the value of using hybrid imaging to distinguish benign from malignant bone disease; the structural details provided by CT were helpful to derive the diagnosis, potentially impacting patient management.

Indexed as

Bone metastasesHybrid imagingIntraosseous lipomaNuclear medicineOncologySPECT/CT

Identifiers

PMID41332967
PMCPMC12666012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.